Some links for the readers to discern – before they launch an SEO campaign (which is now vast) – full of entirely unreasoned commentaries and deliberate exaggerations, incitements by false accusations of racism – you name it – it’s there.
Even an hour long video interview.

If at all possible – try to view this issue through my eyes – a mission to discover a truth – encountering a deliberatey created smokescreen.
Is that hospitable?

cyber bullying

Flag Day

Victims

Is this kind of massive deception to thwart the course of a search for truth – responsible blogging?
Or is this simply the wrong medium to search for truth of a sensitive nature?
Was I “Blogging A Dead Horse?”

will email you.

cheers,
cocoy

I just read your post, and I was hoping that it wouldn’t be too late to invite you to appear today at 6pm on ANC’s Media in Focus. Call time is at 5:30pm at Studio 6, Abs-cbn, and we would very much appreciate your insights regarding blogging, especially as it pertains to the De la Paz issue.

Please contact me through pat.evangelista@gmail.com or through Facebook, and I’ll be happy to call you directly if you can leave a contact. We would be glad to have you.

Cheers,

Patricia Evangelista
Executive Producer
Media in Focus, ANC

New Media working fine.

What better way to exemplify Cocoy’s article than this communication.

I thank everyone for such engaged and passionate comments, especially on this issue which we all have a stake in.

Blogging is indeed probably one of the greatest medium with which our own democracy has been put into our own hands, it is a tool, but with such things, we need to able to remain civil while always looking into the greater topic of discussion.

In this respect, let us try to look into the essence of Cocoy’s article, and refrain from ad hominem attacks that lead us away from the writers goal of his article. Cocoy did us a great service in this article, let us reciprocate by bringing our insights and not our own personal battles into the fray.

I appreciate the consideration

– Nick

1. Comment by baycas
2009-01-10 23:53:46
I wonder why the comment box is “obliterated” in the blog post Obliterated:

Edit
Removed link and title because I don’t want to give link love

2. Comment by baycas
2009-01-11 00:01:24
I wonder why the comment box is “obliterated” in the blog post …….

Edit
Sorry edited your comment and removed link because I don’t want to give link love to this particular person.

3. Comment by Noemi
2009-01-11 00:26:02
He has every right to speculate why I changed my entry.

Let me explain to Manuel Viloria because he doesn’t seem to get the idea that I have every right to edit my entry.

When I wrote “dysfunctional”, I didn’t know he was a Peacemaker appointee until the next day or was it two days after. So I edited it. Thought it was a better replacement because of the irony.

Of course, now he puts malice into it even questioning my credibility.

But did it change the essence of my whole opinion? No.

4. Comment by Noemi
2009-01-11 00:28:36
ewan ask MV. He has every right not to place a comment box. Baka takot siya to receive comments. Blind item pa. How did you know Manuel referred to me anyway? there was no link referring to this blog. Did he ask you to comment here?

Over at MV’s blog (an update was given) 2009-01-11 00:38:00
MV noted Noemi’s Multiply version of the “equally dysfunctional” line was already edited sans disclosure of editing or update.

5. Comment by Noemi
2009-01-11 01:38:46
there was no link referring to this blog. Did he ask you to comment here? if not, how did you know it was my blog?

6. Comment by baycas
2009-01-11 14:15:03
I followed link on the said blog post when I was Google blog searching.

Google “dysfunctional pangandaman” and it will lead to your blog. Not contented with that, please try googling “dysfunctional bambee.”

7. Comment by Noemi
2009-01-11 16:48:08
How interesting that Manuel said the same thing in his blog re google cache. You think I am afraid of google cache? Read my lips: My sentence still stands the same.

—–

@Noemi

I don’t mind if you edited my comments (…it’s your blog) but why this kind of reaction when all the while I was sending you a heads-up on the editing lapse you’ve committed?

Were you ok then?

Btw, ANC viewers will be able to READ YOUR LIPS when you talk about full disclosure in blogging in order to maintain credibility and when you speak about the effect of jumping to conclusions in the New Media.

Comment by Noemi
2009-01-13 18:49:27
…Incidentally, you will hear more from me when I guest in ANC’s Media in Focus hosted by Che che lazaro on Thursday, January 15 6 to 7 pm. The topic is “de la paz and blogging”. Other guests are Carlo conde, atty disini and someone from Ang Kapatiran.

Denial is pointless. Remember twitter?

The Ca t, I do not deny the twitter message in 2007 which was meant for my twitter friends. I am aware Plurk is not entirely private. For the record, I am not denying anything until I see the transcript…. because I don’t recall or may have forgotten.

The only cat I plurk about is my new kitty, Missy .

If you want to discuss this further, just email me at noemidado@gmail.com. I don’t want to clutter the comment sections. Thank you.