Comments on: David VS Gloriath (UPDATED)

By: Ding Gagelonia

Ding Gagelonia — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:40:03 +0000

Really Prime?

You said, “… If GMA takes another route, say run for president instead…”

Pray tell bro, how can this scenario unfold?

By: Primer

Primer — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:37:21 +0000

UP n grad,

Thanks.

I sure know how weak a ‘prescription’ it was from ding. Sad to see them eat their words.

By: Primer

Primer — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:27:08 +0000

Nothing too far afield ding.

Theoretically, Randy’s approach is piecemeal yet it thinks utopia. In the language of social engineering, Randy took both routes – run for congressional seat to ‘re-engineer’ the ‘damaged democratic edifice’.

Something on that light, ding.

By: BongV

BongV — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:04:13 +0000

not anymore.

By: Ding Gagelonia

Ding Gagelonia — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:55:17 +0000

I’ve pored through them, Prof.

But you’re prolly in a much better position to give FV readers a better appreciation of the intra-faculty dynamic that transpired in the case.

Do us the favor?

By: Liam

Liam — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:40:23 +0000

^_^

By: Bencard

Bencard — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:01:07 +0000

so what say you, blackshama? that it isn’t?”

By: blackshama

blackshama — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:10:58 +0000

The tsismis is that the Socio department hasn’t laid in black and white their reasons for not granting Sarah Raymundo tenure. I am just puzzled by the reversal of decisions and recommendation as outlined in the tenureforsarahraymundo. blogspot.com blog.

By: Ding G. Gagelonia

Ding G. Gagelonia — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:36:07 +0000

Hear, hear.

By: Ding G. Gagelonia

Ding G. Gagelonia — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:35:12 +0000

I can’t but agree, Professor.

But do you think it insurmountable in the sense that the Raymundo case could be presumed to have been decided collegially?