<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election 2010: Public Counting &amp; Code Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review</link>
	<description>Powered By A Collective Voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagongbayani</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-129935</link>
		<dc:creator>bagongbayani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-129935</guid>
		<description>Alek Boyd first claimed that Smartmatic is owned by Hugo Chavez and his cronies. Now he claims that Chavez banned Smartmatic from doing business in Venezuela.  This defies common logic! So which is which, Mr. Boyd?  Which of these innuendos do you stand by?  Or are you just against anything Smartmatic does? Or are just against anything Chavez does? I&#039;m totally confused!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alek Boyd first claimed that Smartmatic is owned by Hugo Chavez and his cronies. Now he claims that Chavez banned Smartmatic from doing business in Venezuela.  This defies common logic! So which is which, Mr. Boyd?  Which of these innuendos do you stand by?  Or are you just against anything Smartmatic does? Or are just against anything Chavez does? I&#8217;m totally confused!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNDL</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-104805</link>
		<dc:creator>MNDL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-104805</guid>
		<description>COMELEC CHAIRMAN MELO assured us that COMELEC will make the source code of the Automated Election System available for review once it is customized and gets certified sometime in February. Yes, we have no problem with promises. Lovers often do that. Groovy? We’ll see.

“A Stalled Right to Review the Election Source Code”
http://www.mndlaw.net/?p=477</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COMELEC CHAIRMAN MELO assured us that COMELEC will make the source code of the Automated Election System available for review once it is customized and gets certified sometime in February. Yes, we have no problem with promises. Lovers often do that. Groovy? We’ll see.</p>
<p>“A Stalled Right to Review the Election Source Code”<br />
<a href="http://www.mndlaw.net/?p=477" rel="nofollow">http://www.mndlaw.net/?p=477</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alek Boyd</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-85288</link>
		<dc:creator>Alek Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-85288</guid>
		<description>bagongbayani, not even Smartmatic officials have been able to prove my investigation wrong. It is so accurate in fact that it prompted them to exit the USA without having complied with requests of ownership structure issues by the CFIUS.

Would you like to set the record straight and provide here incontrovertible evidence that I have written are &quot;innuendos without an ounce iota of proof&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bagongbayani, not even Smartmatic officials have been able to prove my investigation wrong. It is so accurate in fact that it prompted them to exit the USA without having complied with requests of ownership structure issues by the CFIUS.</p>
<p>Would you like to set the record straight and provide here incontrovertible evidence that I have written are &#8220;innuendos without an ounce iota of proof&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvj</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-82145</link>
		<dc:creator>cvj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-82145</guid>
		<description>I agree with your approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex Muga</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-81998</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Muga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-81998</guid>
		<description>This one is recent and it happened here:

From CAC’s Post-election Report on the Use of Automated Election System (AES) in the 2008 ARMM Elections:

“There was a report submitted by Avante to COMELEC regarding changing the data of election results remotely from Manila head office by Smartmatic-Sahi that if left unchecked can lead to widespread vote reduction and padding.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is recent and it happened here:</p>
<p>From CAC’s Post-election Report on the Use of Automated Election System (AES) in the 2008 ARMM Elections:</p>
<p>“There was a report submitted by Avante to COMELEC regarding changing the data of election results remotely from Manila head office by Smartmatic-Sahi that if left unchecked can lead to widespread vote reduction and padding.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagongbayani</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-81973</link>
		<dc:creator>bagongbayani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-81973</guid>
		<description>Do you know the owner of the vcrisis site? His name is Alex Boyd, an exiled Venezuelan oppositionist.  Check him out. These are all inuendos without an ounce iota of proof.
Sir Orlando, I didn&#039;t know you are an esteemed member of the Board of Censors. Sir, did you even pass the Bar? Did you eventually successfully defended your economics dissertation or even start one? Or are you just a professional student? What a poser! LOL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know the owner of the vcrisis site? His name is Alex Boyd, an exiled Venezuelan oppositionist.  Check him out. These are all inuendos without an ounce iota of proof.<br />
Sir Orlando, I didn&#8217;t know you are an esteemed member of the Board of Censors. Sir, did you even pass the Bar? Did you eventually successfully defended your economics dissertation or even start one? Or are you just a professional student? What a poser! LOL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orlando Roncesvalles</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-81801</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlando Roncesvalles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-81801</guid>
		<description>I think you were being kind to bagongbayani. He appointed himself debate referee and character judge of certain others. Is that proper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you were being kind to bagongbayani. He appointed himself debate referee and character judge of certain others. Is that proper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GabbyD</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-81795</link>
		<dc:creator>GabbyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-81795</guid>
		<description>read ur comments below. thanks. 

as per your description, it needn&#039;t be 30 inches long. 

with 450 names*(1/5 inches per name) that makes 90 inches, one sided, one column

two sided, 2 columns means 22.5 inch long ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read ur comments below. thanks. </p>
<p>as per your description, it needn&#8217;t be 30 inches long. </p>
<p>with 450 names*(1/5 inches per name) that makes 90 inches, one sided, one column</p>
<p>two sided, 2 columns means 22.5 inch long ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GabbyD</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-81789</link>
		<dc:creator>GabbyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-81789</guid>
		<description>thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GabbyD</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/election-2010-public-counting-code-review/comment-page-1#comment-81788</link>
		<dc:creator>GabbyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinovoices.com/?p=7088#comment-81788</guid>
		<description>are there smartmatic technical links to their system you can share? 

if you could do that, that would be great! 

i&#039;m sure interested observers would like to know what the system is, and then read your critiques...

salamat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are there smartmatic technical links to their system you can share? </p>
<p>if you could do that, that would be great! </p>
<p>i&#8217;m sure interested observers would like to know what the system is, and then read your critiques&#8230;</p>
<p>salamat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

