Comments on: Last Dance of the Chachacheros http://filipinovoices.com/last-dance-of-the-chachacheros Powered By A Collective Voice Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: Current » The right fight at the wrong time? http://filipinovoices.com/last-dance-of-the-chachacheros/comment-page-1#comment-22348 Current » The right fight at the wrong time? Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:39:05 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1011#comment-22348 [...] some sort of resolution by the Supreme Court to sort out it’s meaning (in marked contrast to Dean Jorge Bocobo’s strong belief the Charter is immune to being interpreted in any but a strictly bicameral [...] [...] some sort of resolution by the Supreme Court to sort out it’s meaning (in marked contrast to Dean Jorge Bocobo’s strong belief the Charter is immune to being interpreted in any but a strictly bicameral [...]

]]> By: Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose » Today's Dose » The right fight at the wrong time? http://filipinovoices.com/last-dance-of-the-chachacheros/comment-page-1#comment-21993 Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose » Today's Dose » The right fight at the wrong time? Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:51:34 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1011#comment-21993 [...] some sort of resolution by the Supreme Court to sort out it’s meaning (in marked contrast to Dean Jorge Bocobo’s strong belief the Charter is immune to being interpreted in any but a strictly bicameral [...] [...] some sort of resolution by the Supreme Court to sort out it’s meaning (in marked contrast to Dean Jorge Bocobo’s strong belief the Charter is immune to being interpreted in any but a strictly bicameral [...]

]]> By: Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose » Today's Dose » God wills it! Dieu le veult! http://filipinovoices.com/last-dance-of-the-chachacheros/comment-page-1#comment-17542 Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose » Today's Dose » God wills it! Dieu le veult! Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:13:09 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1011#comment-17542 [...] Dean Jorge Bocobo over at Filipino Voices thinks the Supreme Court wouldn’t be so crazy as to throw away its reputation in craven obedience to the President. Along the way, he also gives a fine summary of the constitutional and procedural issues in play: A major Constitutional conundrum has arisen around Section 1(1) above because two entirely different meanings may be given to the clause “upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members”. It all depends on whether the Congress’ two chambers, House and Senate, are to ”vote jointly” or “vote separately” to propose amendments or revisions for ratification at plebiscite. [...] [...] Dean Jorge Bocobo over at Filipino Voices thinks the Supreme Court wouldn’t be so crazy as to throw away its reputation in craven obedience to the President. Along the way, he also gives a fine summary of the constitutional and procedural issues in play: A major Constitutional conundrum has arisen around Section 1(1) above because two entirely different meanings may be given to the clause “upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members”. It all depends on whether the Congress’ two chambers, House and Senate, are to ”vote jointly” or “vote separately” to propose amendments or revisions for ratification at plebiscite. [...]

]]> By: Current » Dieu le veult! God wills it! http://filipinovoices.com/last-dance-of-the-chachacheros/comment-page-1#comment-17536 Current » Dieu le veult! God wills it! Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:51:39 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1011#comment-17536 [...] Dean Jorge Bocobo over at Filipino Voices thinks the Supreme Court wouldn’t be so crazy as to throw away its reputation in craven obedience to the President. Along the way, he also gives a fine summary of the constitutional and procedural issues in play: A major Constitutional conundrum has arisen around Section 1(1) above because two entirely different meanings may be given to the clause “upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members”. It all depends on whether the Congress’ two chambers, House and Senate, are to ”vote jointly” or “vote separately” to propose amendments or revisions for ratification at plebiscite. [...] [...] Dean Jorge Bocobo over at Filipino Voices thinks the Supreme Court wouldn’t be so crazy as to throw away its reputation in craven obedience to the President. Along the way, he also gives a fine summary of the constitutional and procedural issues in play: A major Constitutional conundrum has arisen around Section 1(1) above because two entirely different meanings may be given to the clause “upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members”. It all depends on whether the Congress’ two chambers, House and Senate, are to ”vote jointly” or “vote separately” to propose amendments or revisions for ratification at plebiscite. [...]

]]> By: Ding G. Gagelonia http://filipinovoices.com/last-dance-of-the-chachacheros/comment-page-1#comment-17508 Ding G. Gagelonia Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:17:25 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1011#comment-17508 Kuya DJB, The train is rolling out of the station as we write. Today is supposed to be D-Day for the House Committee of Revision of Laws to report out the cha-cha resolution on second reading, ostensibly with priority focus on lifting the 40-percent constitutional limit on foreign equity in industries. But the objective really is to remove the term limit on the incumbent and also to push federalism. Then the railroad will proceed to the issue of thge two chambers voting as when, with the train engineers ready to take it all the way for the Supreme Court which by the time the case is decided will likely be populated by GMA appointees with the only exception of CJ Reynato Puno. You may care to click back to one of my recent posts on the newly discovered legal bluster of Solicitor General Agness Devanadera who's widely rumored to ascend to the High Court as soon as one of the seven upcoming vacancies opens up. Kuya DJB,

The train is rolling out of the station as we write. Today is supposed to be D-Day for the House Committee of Revision of Laws to report out the cha-cha resolution on second reading, ostensibly with priority focus on lifting the 40-percent constitutional limit on foreign equity in industries.

But the objective really is to remove the term limit on the incumbent and also to push federalism.

Then the railroad will proceed to the issue of thge two chambers voting as when, with the train engineers ready to take it all the way for the Supreme Court which by the time the case is decided will likely be populated by GMA appointees with the only exception of CJ Reynato Puno.

You may care to click back to one of my recent posts on the newly discovered legal bluster of Solicitor General Agness Devanadera who’s widely rumored to ascend to the High Court as soon as one of the seven upcoming vacancies opens up.

]]>