For instance, a not too self-reflecting comment as that of beancurd would more reflect him than it would the intended reference person. At the very least, some of us at FV really have the crippling almost vicious even – supremacist attitude.

Truth is, there was no point of view presented in that blog of RG, was there when in tokenly acquired free space to lay the statement from FG and the “mass was ended”.

What benefits will reader get from that than they already heard and known, pray tell? And for anyone to say – “otherwise this is no place for the likes of you – what could have been the rational basis if compelling reason for any commenter to have said that based on a comment that neither carries what RG is quick to accuse me of?

Sometimes indeed, beancurd, I think the best example of one who speaks from both sides of his mouth maybe people you know who. Review the literature of the posters and you will know.

Am I bully? Was there any debate reduced to personal attacks? Will you please go over the short comment and point to me what was personal about that? It weighs in something else than what has been the almost unstudied response.

I am commenting so why should I keep silent? Is that the mindset of one who claims oppositive to that bill on right of reply, come on folks? It must betray your stand on the issue in an earlier post.

The beauty of this forum is that we do not have to know each other in any personal basis so don’t even try to sort of brag who you are and how excellent your boss is since the first instance that one says otherwise, we see just how bad you are falling. This is just an advise.

I still respect FV and I do know how this has been well composed of journalists and bloggers of respect and caliber.

Tell that to beancurd to just keep silent and I cannot imagine if you can still have more space to write on.

You should have known already that personal attacks are common to us pinoys…here in FV also…many among us here can not stand being bullied during debates or arguments on issues…ayaw magpatalo ika nga…parang politiko..and so they resort to crappy and politiko style of shit-debating hehehehe

dont mind them…they dont have minds bwahahahaha

thanks.
and bert—THANK YOU. FINALLY SOMEONE SAID IT.

As RG deserves a fair comment, karlpopper deserves an answer to his question, but RG has no obligation to answer. That’s just me

I just want to understand what your own perspective is given your proximity to the story as member of the MPC.

Care to give us your firsthand insights apart frpm just posting the FG’S press statement?

I think a look out the FV site has the right column for new stories and the main post column for analysis/opinion.

Thanks.

Let me ask, is this a press release or why the totally one-sided full description of the author’s theme?

Not one word dropped to introduce the contrary view.

What is this?

Why did he involved himself in the World Bank
mess in the first place ?

“What goes up must go down, and as you go down, you meet all of those you stepped on going up.”