<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court declares MOA-AD unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional</link>
	<description>Powered By A Collective Voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primer Pagunuran</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-211219</link>
		<dc:creator>Primer Pagunuran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-211219</guid>
		<description>It is probably time to do a &#039;review of literature&#039; in order to enlighten as well as accustom ourselves on how to best analyze the problem in relation to certain policy alternatives, policy outcomes and the like.

Tommy seems to argue more correctly on the matter but then again the search for existing literature on the subject would be most helpful if studies or researches have already been done so we can fully understand not just the context but the content as well of erecting, if it should be erected, a Bangsamoro Republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is probably time to do a &#8216;review of literature&#8217; in order to enlighten as well as accustom ourselves on how to best analyze the problem in relation to certain policy alternatives, policy outcomes and the like.</p>
<p>Tommy seems to argue more correctly on the matter but then again the search for existing literature on the subject would be most helpful if studies or researches have already been done so we can fully understand not just the context but the content as well of erecting, if it should be erected, a Bangsamoro Republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Pangcoga</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-210882</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Pangcoga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-210882</guid>
		<description>Oh, to jester in exile. If you would like to delve deep into the mind of a moro, please feel free to google &quot;I am a Moro&quot; and read the article. Maybe you could get insights from it. I just hope to God that you won&#039;t read it with your prejudiced lens in place. It would be good if you could read it from an objective and historical point of view.

God bless us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, to jester in exile. If you would like to delve deep into the mind of a moro, please feel free to google &#8220;I am a Moro&#8221; and read the article. Maybe you could get insights from it. I just hope to God that you won&#8217;t read it with your prejudiced lens in place. It would be good if you could read it from an objective and historical point of view.</p>
<p>God bless us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Pangcoga</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-210879</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Pangcoga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-210879</guid>
		<description>So sorry i only got to find this site only now. 
 
Anyway, a lot of civil society organizations and communities here in mindanao believe that the MOA-AD is not dead. Legal considerations notwithstanding.

And in response to this thread, in the drafting of the content of the MOA-AD, it was agreed by BOTH panels that Bangsamoro refers to BOTH Islamized (moro) and non-Islamized (lumad) natives of Mindanao. This explains the straight-away sentences.

How this came to be prior to the peace talks? Thank the Americans for this. Both Moro and Lumad were lumped together under one political-geographical designation during their occupation: Moro Province. Then the Quezon Commonwealth did a copycat of this: Bureau of Non-Christians (or something like that). Much in the same way that the identity of the Moro began as a derogatory tag from the majority mainstream or the occupying colonizers but was later claimed with pride as the name for a national identity older than the republic, the presumption that &quot;Bangsamoro&quot; refers to both Non- Islamized Lumad and Islamized Lumad would arguably be with basis. Now if there are dissenting opinions about this, well, this is a democratic county, supposedly. 

As to who is the Borg, i think its the majority mainstream, whatever they call themselves (Filipino, indio, etc, whatever). Because in this case, the Moro and the Lumad will never allow themselves to be assimilated by the easternized-westernized chopsuey culture that the majority now has. And besides, never in the history of their dominance and control over these two minorities did they show in action and not only in documents that don&#039;t hold much water that indeed the minorities are part of the greater Philippine body politic. Case in point: the five poorest provinces in the Philippines are the very provinces that constitute the ARMM. So why don&#039;t we blame those governing the ARMM? Because they are just mere puppets of the national hierarchy, who during the past administration brought corruption and impunity to new heights. Greater blame rests on national government systems (the so called &quot;ang bulok na systema&quot;), because whoever is in power, political will notwithstanding, you get eaten up alive by the flow of the current. Again, thank the Americans for introducing a brand of system that is only most effective to whites, but not to multi-ethnic brown skinned natives of this archipelago. They are the greater borg. and they have &quot;borgified&quot; the mainstream majority of this country. 

So i do not blame those who seek to be restored of their lost right to self governance. Because in this country, for as long as you are a minority, you don&#039;t count. Tell me if the Filipino people is matured enough to elect a Moro or a Lumad (true natives) who has all the traits to be a national leader to malacanang. track record says it wont. Proof: Erap.

So touche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sorry i only got to find this site only now. </p>
<p>Anyway, a lot of civil society organizations and communities here in mindanao believe that the MOA-AD is not dead. Legal considerations notwithstanding.</p>
<p>And in response to this thread, in the drafting of the content of the MOA-AD, it was agreed by BOTH panels that Bangsamoro refers to BOTH Islamized (moro) and non-Islamized (lumad) natives of Mindanao. This explains the straight-away sentences.</p>
<p>How this came to be prior to the peace talks? Thank the Americans for this. Both Moro and Lumad were lumped together under one political-geographical designation during their occupation: Moro Province. Then the Quezon Commonwealth did a copycat of this: Bureau of Non-Christians (or something like that). Much in the same way that the identity of the Moro began as a derogatory tag from the majority mainstream or the occupying colonizers but was later claimed with pride as the name for a national identity older than the republic, the presumption that &#8220;Bangsamoro&#8221; refers to both Non- Islamized Lumad and Islamized Lumad would arguably be with basis. Now if there are dissenting opinions about this, well, this is a democratic county, supposedly. </p>
<p>As to who is the Borg, i think its the majority mainstream, whatever they call themselves (Filipino, indio, etc, whatever). Because in this case, the Moro and the Lumad will never allow themselves to be assimilated by the easternized-westernized chopsuey culture that the majority now has. And besides, never in the history of their dominance and control over these two minorities did they show in action and not only in documents that don&#8217;t hold much water that indeed the minorities are part of the greater Philippine body politic. Case in point: the five poorest provinces in the Philippines are the very provinces that constitute the ARMM. So why don&#8217;t we blame those governing the ARMM? Because they are just mere puppets of the national hierarchy, who during the past administration brought corruption and impunity to new heights. Greater blame rests on national government systems (the so called &#8220;ang bulok na systema&#8221;), because whoever is in power, political will notwithstanding, you get eaten up alive by the flow of the current. Again, thank the Americans for introducing a brand of system that is only most effective to whites, but not to multi-ethnic brown skinned natives of this archipelago. They are the greater borg. and they have &#8220;borgified&#8221; the mainstream majority of this country. </p>
<p>So i do not blame those who seek to be restored of their lost right to self governance. Because in this country, for as long as you are a minority, you don&#8217;t count. Tell me if the Filipino people is matured enough to elect a Moro or a Lumad (true natives) who has all the traits to be a national leader to malacanang. track record says it wont. Proof: Erap.</p>
<p>So touche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Limjap</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-20456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Limjap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-20456</guid>
		<description>jenifer,

Well, you can throw a grenade at a plaza in Zamboanga right now and then proclaim to high heavens that the answer is &quot;no&quot;, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jenifer,</p>
<p>Well, you can throw a grenade at a plaza in Zamboanga right now and then proclaim to high heavens that the answer is &#8220;no&#8221;, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenifer</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-20427</link>
		<dc:creator>jenifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-20427</guid>
		<description>our opinion doesn&#039;t matter the question is &quot; Is thre peace in Mindanao&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>our opinion doesn&#8217;t matter the question is &#8221; Is thre peace in Mindanao&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jester-in-Exile</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-12835</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jester-in-Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-12835</guid>
		<description>and to further clarify why j carpio strikes that down, he said this (all emphasis still his):

===

The MOA-AD divests the Lumads of their ancestral domains and hands over possession, ownership and jurisdiction of their ancestral domains to the BJE. In paragraphs 2, 3 and 6 on Concepts and Principles, the MOA-AD gives ownership over the Bangsamoros’ ancestral domain to the Bangsamoro people, defines the ancestral domain of the Bangsamoros, and vests jurisdiction and authority over such ancestral domain in the BJE, thus:

&lt;blockquote&gt;2.  It is essential to lay the foundation of the Bangsamoro homeland in order to address the Bangsamoro people’s humanitarian and economic needs as well as their political aspirations. Such territorial jurisdictions and geographic areas being the natural wealth and patrimony represent the social, cultural and political identity and pride of all the &lt;strong&gt;Bangsamoro people.  Ownership of the homeland&lt;/strong&gt; is vested exclusively in them by virtue of their prior rights of occupation that had inhered in them as sizeable bodies of people, delimited by their ancestors since time immemorial, and being the first politically organized dominant occupants. 

3. x x x Ancestral domain and ancestral land refer to those &lt;strong&gt;held under claim of ownership, occupied or possessed, by themselves or through the ancestors of the Bangsamoro people&lt;/strong&gt;, communally or individually x x x. 

x x x x

6.  Both Parties agree that &lt;strong&gt;the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE) shall have the authority and jurisdiction over the Ancestral Domain and Ancestral lands&lt;/strong&gt;, including both alienable and non-alienable lands encompassed within their homeland and ancestral territory, as well as the delineation of ancestral domains/lands of the Bangsamoro people located therein. (Emphasis supplied)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

After defining the Bangsamoro people to include all the Lumads, the MOA-AD then defines the ancestral domain of the Bangsamoro people as the ancestral domain of all the Bangsamoros, which now includes the ancestral domains of all the Lumads.  The MOA-AD declares that exclusive ownership over the Bangsamoro ancestral domain belongs to the Bangsamoro people. The MOA-AD vests jurisdiction and authority over the Bangsamoros’ ancestral domain in the BJE. Thus, the Lumads lost not only their separate identities but also their ancestral domains to the Bangsamoros and the BJE.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

===

in the MOA-AD, the lumads &quot;lost not only their separate identities but also their ancestral domains to the Bangsamoros and the BJE&quot;...

nowhere in the MOA-AD makes the distinction between &quot;the Moro people and the IPs&quot; that you have quite unsuccessfully tried to present. in fact, i would suggest this phrase, yet again, to apply to the MOA-AD:

&lt;blockquote&gt;“We are the Borg. Your culture will adapt to service ours. Resistance is futile.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

merely replace &quot;Borg&quot; with MILF and &quot;Your culture&quot; with &quot;Your people&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and to further clarify why j carpio strikes that down, he said this (all emphasis still his):</p>
<p>===</p>
<p>The MOA-AD divests the Lumads of their ancestral domains and hands over possession, ownership and jurisdiction of their ancestral domains to the BJE. In paragraphs 2, 3 and 6 on Concepts and Principles, the MOA-AD gives ownership over the Bangsamoros’ ancestral domain to the Bangsamoro people, defines the ancestral domain of the Bangsamoros, and vests jurisdiction and authority over such ancestral domain in the BJE, thus:</p>
<blockquote><p>2.  It is essential to lay the foundation of the Bangsamoro homeland in order to address the Bangsamoro people’s humanitarian and economic needs as well as their political aspirations. Such territorial jurisdictions and geographic areas being the natural wealth and patrimony represent the social, cultural and political identity and pride of all the <strong>Bangsamoro people.  Ownership of the homeland</strong> is vested exclusively in them by virtue of their prior rights of occupation that had inhered in them as sizeable bodies of people, delimited by their ancestors since time immemorial, and being the first politically organized dominant occupants. </p>
<p>3. x x x Ancestral domain and ancestral land refer to those <strong>held under claim of ownership, occupied or possessed, by themselves or through the ancestors of the Bangsamoro people</strong>, communally or individually x x x. </p>
<p>x x x x</p>
<p>6.  Both Parties agree that <strong>the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE) shall have the authority and jurisdiction over the Ancestral Domain and Ancestral lands</strong>, including both alienable and non-alienable lands encompassed within their homeland and ancestral territory, as well as the delineation of ancestral domains/lands of the Bangsamoro people located therein. (Emphasis supplied)</p></blockquote>
<p>After defining the Bangsamoro people to include all the Lumads, the MOA-AD then defines the ancestral domain of the Bangsamoro people as the ancestral domain of all the Bangsamoros, which now includes the ancestral domains of all the Lumads.  The MOA-AD declares that exclusive ownership over the Bangsamoro ancestral domain belongs to the Bangsamoro people. The MOA-AD vests jurisdiction and authority over the Bangsamoros’ ancestral domain in the BJE. Thus, the Lumads lost not only their separate identities but also their ancestral domains to the Bangsamoros and the BJE.</p>
<p>===</p>
<p>in the MOA-AD, the lumads &#8220;lost not only their separate identities but also their ancestral domains to the Bangsamoros and the BJE&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>nowhere in the MOA-AD makes the distinction between &#8220;the Moro people and the IPs&#8221; that you have quite unsuccessfully tried to present. in fact, i would suggest this phrase, yet again, to apply to the MOA-AD:</p>
<blockquote><p>“We are the Borg. Your culture will adapt to service ours. Resistance is futile.” </p></blockquote>
<p>merely replace &#8220;Borg&#8221; with MILF and &#8220;Your culture&#8221; with &#8220;Your people&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jester-in-Exile</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-12833</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jester-in-Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-12833</guid>
		<description>anyway, to answer your 11:01, danilo (thanks for the amusing distraction, by the way) -- still from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/october2008/183591-carpio.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;carpio&#039;s concurrence&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;In fact, representatives of the 18 Lumad groups met in Cagayan de Oro City and announced on 27 August 2008, through their convenor Timuay Nanding Mudai, that &lt;strong&gt;“we cannot accept that we are part of the Bangsamoro.”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

emphasis not mine, but j carpio&#039;s, if you need ask, as was the emphasis in my 5:30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyway, to answer your 11:01, danilo (thanks for the amusing distraction, by the way) &#8212; still from <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/october2008/183591-carpio.htm" rel="nofollow">carpio&#8217;s concurrence</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In fact, representatives of the 18 Lumad groups met in Cagayan de Oro City and announced on 27 August 2008, through their convenor Timuay Nanding Mudai, that <strong>“we cannot accept that we are part of the Bangsamoro.”</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>emphasis not mine, but j carpio&#8217;s, if you need ask, as was the emphasis in my 5:30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danilo u. ignacio</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-12824</link>
		<dc:creator>danilo u. ignacio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-12824</guid>
		<description>ok, well believe you me, i still have to practice shooting a gun next, if i may, because i had not yet tried even the short one for the life of me; nor had tried to slaughter a chicken even once, though I know how it is to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, well believe you me, i still have to practice shooting a gun next, if i may, because i had not yet tried even the short one for the life of me; nor had tried to slaughter a chicken even once, though I know how it is to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jester-in-Exile</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-12822</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jester-in-Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-12822</guid>
		<description>well, imitation isn&#039;t being. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, imitation isn&#8217;t being. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danilo u. ignacio</title>
		<link>http://filipinovoices.com/supreme-court-declares-moa-ad-unconstitutional/comment-page-1#comment-12821</link>
		<dc:creator>danilo u. ignacio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=823#comment-12821</guid>
		<description>am i angry? is imitating to become reasonable, as the FV folks are, an act of anger to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i angry? is imitating to become reasonable, as the FV folks are, an act of anger to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

