http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/home/nation/12575-palace-eyes-military-adventurists-in-destabilization-plot.html

God, please no! I don’t want — nor expect — a conversation with you similar to one with MB. He doesn’t converse. You do. No need to ask me to keep it civil; I commit to it.

So, dealing with “substance”…

I think that there are portions of the media which are PRO-admin. That’s why I’m asking which ones you think are UN-biased. It’s not a trick question, you know.

For example, there are some who will say Oplan Moon is all an admin/milit plan, while others will say this is an opposition trick/misdirection. Is there a medium which will give both interpretations a fair share of space?
———-

Anyway, can you now answer the questions I asked? They weren’t offensive or personal; they are legit inquiries, no?

You want to keep the exchange at the sober level, I would guess, in contrast to your exchange with say MB?

Then read back your:

“I don’t have much exposure to the various options.”

“…you have basically taken ownership of the Oplan Moon possibility…”

Di naman siguro tayo tanga.

You’re in Metro Manila right?

You want me to believe that in wholesale manner the news media are biased against GMA?

I’ve been in journalism long enough to know that despite the press being naturally adversarial, there are sustained efforts to be fair and balanced, and objective whenever possible.

Await my next post, if you care to. Here at FV and in my home blog.

Please stop with the “hidden hand” and “possum” BS. It’s starting to get irritating. Again, stop trying to read my mind and see my soul; please just deal with what’s being said/asked. Why do you keep keep doing this?
———–

I asked if you have an opinion about which newspaper/tv is pretty unbiased. This is not a trick question; I don’t have much exposure to the various options.
———–

I also turned your own question around (“Is there substance….?”).
———–

Sorry, but all I saw with Primer is that you have specified the number of unnamed, anonymous sources. I don’t see how that changes anything or addresses my “why” questions — why C4? Why did no one take responsibility? Why the Ombudsman office?).

After all, you have basically taken ownership of the Oplan Moon possibility and there are several issues which don’t seemingly mesh well with facts/logic. Please don’t be surprised or offended if I probe a bit.

See my last exchange with Primer above.
Review your Q’s.

Am sure you know where I’m coming from in relation to this and previous threads you’ve had with others here at FV.

No need to play possum.

I was hoping you’d answer my questions…..

Why the Ombudsman? The Ombudsman is responsible for stopping corruption, is my guess. You may see the good works they do, but many do not, and lay a heaping pile of blame on that office.

Joe

I’ve just completed touching base with 4 direct sources in Camp Aguinaldo, and Camp Crame.

Abangan.

My montages, as you realize, are the equivalent of editorial cartoons, and thus embody my POV.

You are welcome to do yours.

What policy is being tested by these whispers? Martial law? What positive response was being seeked? Positive response towards what — bombings? Failed automations? Martial law???