Comments on: The Color Of Doubt Is Gray

By: Renato Pacifico

Renato Pacifico — Sun, 03 May 2009 17:10:50 +0000

With all the ripping and analyzing of Nicole and Smith … has anyone bothered to look and see Nicole’s privacy was violated by the pekeng-peryodistas?

Has anyone took up the fight for Nicole’s privacy? Hey, yo, legal luminaries … why so silent on Nicole’s privacy? What if it happened to your daughters …

I wish it would happen so you’d know what i’m talking about ….

HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

By: At si Nicole ang Hinatulan « Kapirasong Kritika

At si Nicole ang Hinatulan « Kapirasong Kritika — Sun, 03 May 2009 07:10:18 +0000

[...] kabilang banda, nag-iingay ang Kano Sa Pag-iisip at Kulang Sa Pansin na si Dean Jorge Bocobo tungkol sa “pagpapalagay ng pagiging inosente (presumption of innocence)” kahit pa inamin [...]

By: Renato Pacifico

Renato Pacifico — Sun, 03 May 2009 06:30:21 +0000

Stop this deep sickening analysis of Nicole V Smith. It’s over with! Kaput!

LET’S LOOK AT the violation of Nicole’s privacy by the pekeng-peryodistas. I HAVE NOT HEARD FROM ANY SINGLE PEKENG-PERYODISTAS championing her privacy plight!!!!!

Nor anyone of FV’s legal luminaries!!!!

HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

Hindi kayo mahiya?????HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

By: jcc

jcc — Sun, 03 May 2009 05:24:58 +0000

hahahaha, as usual baycas, your sharp analysis stands out. :)

By: baycas

baycas — Sun, 03 May 2009 03:35:13 +0000

What is left undoubted is that the accused is to be accorded his constitutional right of presumption of innocence (POI). POI even the NUJP sanctified in their ethics code. What is left undoubted is that some in the MSM, some bloggers and, of course, the lynch mob falsely convicted the accused even after his acquittal. At least the complainant signified her doubt…when can we expect some form of apology to the accused from the lynch mobbers because of their intrusion to his privacy right and their presumption of guilt?

By: baycas

baycas — Sun, 03 May 2009 03:33:37 +0000

Doubts in Gray

There is doubt in the mind of the doctor at James Gordon Hospital.
There is doubt in the medico-legal evidence (on the complainant’s injuries) –
was there vigorous consensual sex or was there sexual assault?
There is doubt in the complainant’s alleged intoxication/unconsciousness.
There is doubt in the complainant’s testimony due to her inconsistencies and lapses.

There is even doubt on Makati RTC Judge Pozon’s accurate reference to a SCoRP decision – G.R. 95319, mainly that the term “intoxication” is nowhere to be found in the said document. (It was a good thing that his decision to convict was reviewed!)

By: jcc

jcc — Sat, 02 May 2009 22:22:46 +0000

OH BOY, THE SYSTEM IS SO SO f__k UP. I have posted a comments much earlier but I did not see them posted. So what i did was to reedit it and posted it back. System won’t allow long comments to i chop them into chewable chunks.. then afer several hours i found the previous posts juxtaposed with the edited posts…. wheeewwwww.

my apology…

By: GabbyD

GabbyD — Sat, 02 May 2009 20:59:00 +0000

ok lang sana if people just disagree.

but its worse — accusations of a coverup, bribery, etc… alot of people are confused about multiple versions of facts, as well as the basis upon which the CA made its decision.

i think this is a teachable moment, to teach pinoys how the justice system works (or doesnt work).

but the MSM's blowing it…

By: tasio

tasio — Sat, 02 May 2009 20:36:34 +0000

You dont doubt, since examination was done on the victim. She testified, the sex was not consesual. After
the rape, she was dumped by the rapist somewhere. Smith is an acquited rapist…

By: dingg458

dingg458 — Sat, 02 May 2009 20:22:47 +0000

To clarify this aspect of the case surfaced anew in the recent exchanges in the threads on Prof. Margallo's post and DJB's own 'For The Record Lang post…