At the expense giving up a whole day of productive labor, I wrote this piece instead, somewhat distressed by Ding’s comparison of the cockpit joint with the Philippine Senate. I thought the simile far off and the comparison an insult to the cockpit. In one, it is a very inexpensive arena where blood of gallant warriors are shed to enrich its few square foot of soil, in the other, a very expensive and imposing edifice where dishonorable men trade endless tirades at the expense of the populace.
English speaking people had invented the term “chicken-out” to suggest one’s lack of balls or plain cowardice. Western tourists, except for a few, have not been in the cockpit and had not seen roosters fighting in a brief, ferocious and bloody combat. Most of the time, both duelers fought and died in the arena fighting as they gasped their last breath. I see more bravery, honor and fortitude in the cockpit than in the “august halls” of the Senate.

“Chicken out” is a cruel term appended to the chicken and had failed to do justice to the rooster’s ferocious gallantry and valor in the ring. We see cockfight chiefly as a gambling activity and an entertainment and had barely noticed the egalitarian bout in the arena.
Like boxing, the outcome of the fight is not determined by the status of the handlers but by the cock’s or the boxer’s ability to hit its or his opponent with barrage of accurate slashing or pummeling. A poor boxer may prevail over his rich opponent or his opponent opulent handlers. Or a rooster raised by a poor man in his backyard can prevail over a rooster raised in a well-maintained stable whose fighting cocks are fed daily with vitamin supplements, energy food and rich nutrition.
A writer for Microsoft Encarta had observed:
“The cockpit is a curiously egalitarian arena. A cock belonging
to a peasant who owns only two or three birds may defeat, or
fight to a standoff, a bird raised by a wealthy landowner who
maintains a stable of a dozen game birds, a breeder, and a
professional handler”.
Only if the fight is close between the two protagonists and both were breathing their last that the “referee’s deceptive trick” can tilt the winning edge in favor of the slightly lesser fighter, but such erratic decision is often meet with catcalls and resounding “boos” from the spectators. One can see that cocks are honorable fighters and cockfighting aficionados are honorable people who would imperiously protest at obvious cheating. Those who were favored by this cheating would keep quite in the corner and uncomfortable of the idea of his winning by virtue of the umpire’s partiality.
This is also a place where a cockfighting enthusiast can shout out his offer for a hefty bet to a complete stranger across the gallery and seal their agreement by mere hand signals. This practice validates a far better honor code system that inheres within the four walls of an old and tattered cockpit than the imposing Senate floor where acrimonious denials of bribe attempt ever made so the committee can go soft on a colleague that made profit in seeing to it that public funds were spent on highways slithering through his empire of subdivisions spanning several cities in the metropolis.
You see a palpable misconduct of Senator but half of his colleagues were comfortable defending his treachery, where in the cockpit, any perception of cheating is meet with catcalls if not outright physical assault from everybody.
In some other culture, cockfighting is a pastime, a gambling and a form of ritual to cast away the demons and bad spirits An English anthropologist wrote about cockfighting in Bali, Indonesia:
“A cockfight, any cockfight, is in the first instance a blood
sacrifice offered, with the appropriate chants and oblations,
to the demons in order to pacify their ravenous, cannibal
hunger. No temple festival should be conducted until one
is made. x x x. Collective responses to natural evils-illness,
crop failure, volcanic eruptions-almost always involve them.
And that famous holiday in Bali, The Day of Silence (Njepi),
when everyone sits silent and immobile all day long in order
to avoid contact with a sudden influx of demons chased momentarily
out of hell, is preceded the previous day by large-scale cockfights,
in almost every village on the island”.
So you see now Ding, the Philippine Senate and the cockpit are two different arenas. One is filled with scoundrels and scumbags, the other, an unimpressive structure with no hallmark of fame, yet it is where an activity is being held to cast away the demons that possess the other.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Perhaps, JCC.
I’m somewhat kinder then?
The denizens of the Senate must, however, realize that while the Kristos and sabungeros don’t get lynched, except when cheating is exposed, the cocks turn into the talunan dish eventually with their throats slit.
Incidentally, it’s unseemly to write a blog about a blog, specially if it’s done by such an esteemed personage such as yourself.
It almost soundS like an exercise in hectoring.
Reminds me of another lawyer who used to roam FV.
Still, GBU. :)
ding,
it only goes to show that i read everything you write and i don’t read much- so it says well about me your being an avid fan. but sometimes please proof read your post because the the becomes hte and the for becomes ofr. see how meticulously i combed your articles. but bottomline is, whatever is the deficiency in the form it is more than compensated by honesty and depth.
Cheers, ading.
btw ding,
im tired writing in the basic format of “what, who, when, where” and wish i could write feature-style commentary for a change. i approached your “cockpit” subject from a totally different angle but both of us arrived at the same conclusion that we cannot trust our leaders, but my article, at the expense of bragging, hehehehe, has more sting.
again, cheers, ading….
Those Senators who in truth are “bunch of idiots” are behaving like
children. Why did we vote for these morons?