The Small Difference Between Murder and Attempted Murder
November 14th, 2008 by DJBThe failure to consummate a heinous crime, like murder or rape, does not make the attempt any less heinous. Moreover, there is no guarantee that a failed attempt won’t be repeated, which explains why charges for attempted rape or frustrated murder are never dismissed for being “moot and academic.”
Likewise, the failed attempt to establish an entirely unconstitutional and illegal Bangsamoro Juridical Entity in Mindanao was tantamount to just such an attempted rape or frustrated murder on the 1987 Constitution itself — a heinous crime prevented only by a last-minute TRO issued by the Supreme Court, now made permanent. Ruling on the Constitutional merits of the MOA-AD in Cotabato v. GRP and finding NONE, the Supreme Court rejected Solicitor General Agnes Devanadera’s argument that the issue was now “moot and academic” just because the Palace had “dissolved” its peace panel and promised not to do it again. There is only a small difference between murder and attempted murder, but more importantly, the peace process itself cannot be “moot and academic.” Neither is the Constitution!
Among other things, the Court noted that the assailed act is not only capable of, but likely to be repeated, since the MOA-AD was intended to fulfill the “Ancestral Domain Strand” of the 2001 Tripoli Agreement. An agreement on “ancestral domain” will therefore have to be negotiated as part of that 2001 roadmap and is an integral part of the Mindanao peace process. Indeed ancestral domain is an integral part of the 1987 Constitutional itself, and several subsequent landmark laws, like the Indigenous People’s Rights Act — both of which were brazenly violated by the 2008 GRP MILF MOA-AD.
The Constitutional issues raised by the MOA-AD are NOT moot and academic because the peace process in Mindanao is NOT moot and academic, as events on the ground have amply demonstrated.
Citizens, led by bloggers Manuel L. Quezon III (The Daily Dose), Ron of the The Marocharim Experiment and FEU Law Professor Edwin Lacierda have taken the unprecedented step of “intervening” in the current impeachment complaint against President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo in the House of Representatives.
They advance a worthy argument. Since the Supreme Court has ruled that there was a “grave abuse of discretion” in negotiating this MOA-AD, it remains to establish WHO was ultimately responsible. Failed “consensus points” (as Devanadera calls the provisions of the MOA AD) have led to war and destruction in MIndanao and imperiled the long term prospects for peace there. Someone has definitely screwed the pooch. If these were acts of the President herself, or accomplished by alter egos with her knowledge and bidding, she ought to be impeached and removed from office.
44. The President of the Philippines, in going against the legal advice of her own officials, and in acting in a manner calculated to alarm the public, destabilize public order and security, fan the flames of ethnic and religious mistrust, behaved so irresponsibly and willfully as to render her unfit for office. For her policies, for which she is responsible and accountable, have set back the peace process, inflamed radical sentiments, fostered division and hostility among our people, caused misery and untold suffering to innocent civilians, and needlessly imperiled the lives of members of our armed forces and police, and caused great harm to the economic stability of Mindanao and the entire Philippines.
45. Indubitably, the act of respondent in authorizing the negotiation of the constitutionally infirm MOA-AD, and subsequently approving the same, establishes her blatant, willful, and flagrant disregard of our Constitution. She clearly violated the Constitution, which she swore to preserve and defend, for which, she must be impeached and brought to trial.
It would be willful hallucination to think that the buck stops with Gen. Hermogenes Esperon, who only happened to be the hapless Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process on August 5, 2008 after retiring as CSAFP just a few months before. Jesus Dureza, currently the Press Secretary, ought to be in that catbird seat instead, since he was PAPP ever since Ging Deles quit over Garci. The defense advanced by SolGen Agnes Devanadera that the President was not characteristically, even micromaniacally, involved in every detail of these negotiations with the MILF rebels, is absurd on its face given that as early as August, 2007 the President already mentioned the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity. (See a 2007 post, Ancestral Domain Regime or Bangsamorostan?)


November 18, 2008 at 8:23 pm
here’s a passing thought: why don’t we just evac the civilians, destroy all infrastructure (built by Filipinos, by the way) prior to abandoning that territory, fence off ARMM, give it to the MILF, and shoot anyone who crosses the MILF-Philippines border, whether by land or by sea? no trade with them, no diplomatic relations, no giving them food and medical supplies? why don’t we just leave a scorched-earth, raw, neolithic, start-from-scratch territory to the MILF?
they built nothing there except graves, let’s leave them nothing but the graves they’ve built.
(okay, that was facetious, but i don’t doubt someone’s going to be grovel and beg the GRP for an Act of Union.)
November 19, 2008 at 8:44 am
The Philippines, doing that embargo?huh! And don’t you think other nations will help the Philippines doing that silly thing? Don’t you feel that even America is distancing itself from the Philippine government because it sees nothing from today’s administration? hehehe, what a jest jester! sorry you made me laugh.
The Bangsamoro, got nothin’ DJB?
Isn’t it that the Philippine government can not let go of Mindanao because of its natural resources still untouched, and that 60% of the Philippines’ income comes from Mindanao? Hence, this continuous war it perpetrates and perpetuates against the Moroland?
November 19, 2008 at 9:07 am
DJB and Jester, I do not deny, nor shall I, that the Filipinos indeed fought for their independence.
Hadn’t Aguinaldo even sent those datus in Mindanao with a letter urging them to fight what he called the “common enemies” of the people in these Islands?
But, a tragedy as it was, such declaration of freedom was maliciously arrested by America, grabbed the Philippines from Spain, manipulated the turn of events and instead America declared for the Filipinos their freedom which was supposed to be savored by them from Spain.
Such is America, “the land of democratic ideals,” a country that “cares for, let alone meddle, over the freedom of others.” In fact, it was Americans who put the Moros’ feet into Filipino shoes! You know what I mean and so this mess.
November 19, 2008 at 9:30 am
danilo,
America is the indispensable grievance!
As a historian once said, “There is no more grievous emotional loss than that of a explanation for one’s own tragedies and failures, in terms of the the actions of a another.”
This seems to be especially true. Paradoxically, those who most strenuously berate the supposed meddling and resulting mess and blame it on America, almost always live in America.
In other words, the source of your grievance is in fact a tacit admission of a vast store of faith in America–that she does right most of the time and we are aghast when she does not.
Yet her own history is not exactly pure. There is a virtue greater than purity however: it is corrigibility.
Learn it!
November 19, 2008 at 12:23 pm
“In other words, the source of your grievance is in fact a tacit admission of a vast store of faith in America–that she does right most of the time and we are aghast when she does not.”
Not necessarily, especially in our case.
Instead, these world-wide expressions of grievances against American posturing from the past to these present days send a virtual reproving signal, if it is on her head always, that America must also learn to be corrigible and rectify its mistakes perpetrated by its imperialistic interests against others in the name of democracy if it wants to maintain her world status. Otherwise, America must expect her tragic next, that is, there shall be no other direction for her after reaching the apogee of power other than going down.