http://filipinovoices.com/there-is-nothing-for-scorp-to-decide Powered By A Collective Voice Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 http://filipinovoices.com/there-is-nothing-for-scorp-to-decide/comment-page-1#comment-22714 jcc Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:24:47 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1159#comment-22714 we are being entertained and fall for that. :) we are being entertained and fall for that. :)

]]> http://filipinovoices.com/there-is-nothing-for-scorp-to-decide/comment-page-1#comment-22495 DJB Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:56:11 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1159#comment-22495 Jeg, Speaking at noon, Chiz Escudero makes a good point. Given how weak the conceptual basis of the latest chacha is, what's really happening is an attempt to keep the President from becoming a lame duck for real. As long as the threat of term extension exists, she can keep the House on a short leash. Once it become clear that Chacha is dead, the abandonment can begin. Jeg,
Speaking at noon, Chiz Escudero makes a good point. Given how weak the conceptual basis of the latest chacha is, what’s really happening is an attempt to keep the President from becoming a lame duck for real. As long as the threat of term extension exists, she can keep the House on a short leash. Once it become clear that Chacha is dead, the abandonment can begin.

]]> http://filipinovoices.com/there-is-nothing-for-scorp-to-decide/comment-page-1#comment-22490 Jeg Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:38:49 +0000 http://www.filipinovoices.com/?p=1159#comment-22490 Brilliant. Now if the SC decides to, well, decide on this, will it be violating the separation of powers clause? I think it is one of those things that is right on the border; violating and not violating the separation clause. Im betting the SC will decide on an interpretation, seeing that it is quite an activist SC we have. Brilliant. Now if the SC decides to, well, decide on this, will it be violating the separation of powers clause? I think it is one of those things that is right on the border; violating and not violating the separation clause. Im betting the SC will decide on an interpretation, seeing that it is quite an activist SC we have.

]]>