If you intresting in sport buy steroids you find place where you can find information about steroids

Why the Reproductive Health Bill Debate Affects Every Filipino

In CBCP News, Archbishop Aniceto, justifying the continued population explosion, claimed that European countries and even the Americans have begun to suffer from a “demographic winter” in which the elderly population significantly outnumbers the younger demographic. He says this as an argument against the Reproductive Health Bill, justifying inaction to current situation where thousands of poor Filipino families could no longer support their children’ schooling or sustenance, simply because there is just too much of them.

For decades, Filipinos have been practicing natural family planning methods such as “withdrawal” and it is simply not working. According to a study done by WEDPRO (Women, Education, Productivity, Research Organization) on family planning methods in the rural areas, women have even resorted to using Coke and toothpaste as spermicides, as well as utilized the rubber in tires as condoms. Many women obviously don’t have access to adequate information, much less the social services needed to make sure that their health is maintained during the delicate time of pregnancy and childbirth.

What this population control debate boils down to, however, is a simple supply and demand dynamic. Supply and demand is the basic law in economics that argues that the precarious balance of supply and demand determines prices. Now, what does this mean for wages? As long as there is plenty of supply, say in a huge population like ours, in a country with fluctuating economic growth and therefore unreliable job creation and job market, Filipino wages will always be kept at a bare minimum. Why? Because the slow growth in Philippine economy simply cannot keep up with the number of people who need jobs. Why? Because in a climate of heightened competition, there are always plenty of people willing to work for less. This means that workers are often easily exploited and taken advantage of. Their rights are not upheld because the boss always has the upper hand –”fail to comply and you can always be replaced; there’s always plenty of you out there.”

Education is a basic right of children, and with parents bringing in minimum wages that simply cannot feed their kids, how can we educate Filipinos, much less make them competitive in an increasingly global market?

What is alarming with Archbishop Aniceto’s rhetoric that it’s okay for Filipinos “to go forth and multiply” as it compensates for the aging population elsewhere. Does it then justify the brain drain and mass displacement of Filipinos going abroad, isolated and separated from their families because they cannot get good well-paying jobs in their own country? How is this, in line with the government’s valorization of OFWs, “preserving and upholding the dignity of the Filipino family”? As it is, many Filipino families are already torn and fragmented –with children left alone here while their mothers go abroad to take care of the children of those in richer economies. If, by withholding effective birth control methods, the Catholic Church’s aim is to keep the Filipino family intact, then it has already failed its objective.

Archbishop Aniceto is right however –some European countries, Canada, and even Japan’s population is aging. But what does this have to do with Filipinos, unless we bring to light the fact that right now, several million Filipinos are out there serving these “aging populations” as domestic helpers , caretakers and even as trafficked and prostituted women?

We can’t allow population to keep booming, and then justify that it’s okay, because we can just deploy Filipinos all over the world and leave them to fend for themselves. We have barely secured the rights of Filipinos who set off and risk their luck abroad. Migrant Filipinos, for instance are scattered in over 180 countries all over the world. As it is, we only have bilateral agreements with around 80 of them.

The Filipino state is a metaphor for our parents, and it simply cannot accommodate such an exponential growth in its children, which, according to a 2007 Inquirer article is about 15% faster than our ASEAN peers. We simply can’t blame it on the bad parenting or “corruption” on the parent’s part. The simple logic is this: if you can’t sustain your children, then you better be prepared to stop having children. The old methods have failed. Unless we do something, our women will continue to be at risk for harassment as servants, entertainers and playthings elsewhere, families will continue to be torn apart, and the wages for many hard-working and persevering Filipinos will never be enough for what they deserve.

Submitted by Cai Mariano

Popularity: 4% [?]

Comments

  1. Cai Mariano says:

    According to missing points:

    “contraception will embolden the male chauvinists in us to abuse women because they can always satisfy their lust without worrying about the responsibility that comes with parenting”

    As opposed to now, when they satisfy their lust without worrying about the responsibility that comes with parenting? :)

    The only difference is with contraception, we have no child to worry about. Which leaves the government free to take on the problem of spousal abuse without worrying about childcare.”

    –missing points

    Reproduction is closely linked to abuse sometimes. Sometimes, chauvinist men will just impregnate a woman (against her will) to control her and as an act of violence. This is the kind of abuse we can prevent with proper contraceptive education.

  2. popoi says:

    debating mayaman….halos wala akong maintindihan. iniibig ko ang aking simbahana at kombinsido kaming mga katutubo sa pakay ng simbahang katoliko. kong popwede intindihin nyo bakit kombensido kami, nasa “bahay hari” lang naman kayo, kami ay nandito gumagawa at nag-iisip at nag-paplano pawa sa bukas. dalawa lang anak namin dahil ginamit namin ang konting kaalaman namin. hindi kami gumagamit ng pampatay ninyo ng mga bata at hindi kami nag”label” kahit kanino ng mga masamang pangalan. sana maintindihan nyo kami… sori nakikisulat lang sa kaibigang popoi. wala akong emil. timoay son

    • ali says:

      popoi, magandang ginagamit niyo ang kaalaman niyo at dalawa lamang ang inyong anak. pero bibigyan ko po kayo ng payo, dahil yung mga iminumungkahi ng sinasabing bill ay hindi pampatay ng bata. naintindihan kong mahal niyo po ang inyong simbahan, pero hindi dapat sa lahat ng oras ay tanggapin niyo na lahat ng sinasabi nito at tama at nakararapat para sa marami, o minsan sa lahat. maki-alam po kayo, dahil karapatan nating malaman ang katotohanan.

  3. Popoi, pleez speakenges goot englischtzes. I kannot anderstand you. Kasi bourgeouis ako, e. I don’t nderstand tangalog. Pleez na man speaknegese goot englichtzes … like others here …

    HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

  4. Manny says:

    The advocates of HB 5043 seem to forget that contraceptive usage on a large scale has NOT been shown to lower unintended pregnancies. In fact, it has INCREASED them along with an attendant increase in demand for abortion.

    For example, see the following:

    Increased access to contraception not linked to decrease in numbers of unplanned pregnancies, abortions
    http://www.news-medical.net/?id=20761

    The belief that increased access to contraception will “reduce rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion” has “intuitive appeal, but the data prove otherwise,” Susan Wills, associate director for education for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, writes in a Washington Post letter to the editor in response to a Post opinion piece by William Saletan, science and technology reporter for Slate magazine.

    Habit Persistence and Teen Sex: Could Increased Access to Contraception have Unintended Consequences for Teen Pregnancies?
    http://www.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/teensex.pdf

    The persistence in sexual activity is such that policies that affect access to contraception will have very different effects in the short run than the long run. Our results suggest that increasing access to contraception may actually increase long run pregnancy rates even though short run pregnancy rates fall. On the other and, policies that decrease access to contraception, and hence sexual activity, are likely to lower pregnancy rates in the long run.

    So how is flooding the country with condoms going to solve our economic problems? It won’t. In fact, it will just make matters worse. If anything is moronic, it is those arguments in favor of the RH Bill.

    • ali says:

      I think I was made to believe that the RH Bill will not work alone in trying to slow population growth. Find predominantly Catholic countries and see if any of them legalized abortion. Wag mo tayong ikatulad sa tate. If there would be anything wrong with this bill, it is how it will be implemented, so choose your leaders well.

Trackbacks

Speak Your Mind

*